How Trump’s Revenge Marketing campaign Might Rework the DOJ
That is an version of The Atlantic Each day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends the very best in tradition. Join it right here.
Yesterday afternoon, a federal grand jury indicted New York State Lawyer Common Letitia James on two prices—financial institution fraud and false statements to a monetary establishment—each linked to her buy of a house in Virginia. The federal government is alleging that she saved $18,933 in all.
It’s not the sort of cash the DOJ usually seeks to recoup, however James isn’t simply any alleged fraudster. A outstanding anti-Trump gadfly, James introduced a civil case in opposition to Donald Trump and his firm in 2022 and received, leading to a $500 million high quality being levied in opposition to the president (he later efficiently appealed the high quality and has thus far paid nothing, though the ruling maintained his legal responsibility). Even earlier than that case, James had been outspoken about her criticisms of Trump; in 2018, she referred to as his presidency “illegitimate.”
James’s indictment comes simply greater than two weeks after the Justice Division launched its case in opposition to one other longtime Trump goal, former FBI Director James Comey, on prices that he lied to Congress in 2020. (Each Comey and James deny the fees.) Is that this a coordinated assault on Trump’s enemies? And the way a lot management can the president actually exert over the DOJ’s legal professionals? My colleague Quinta Jurecic, who has lined each indictments, joins me to debate.
Will Gottsegen: Why is now the second to indict each Comey and James in such fast succession?
Quinta Jurecic: The Comey indictment occurred when it did as a result of there was a ticking clock. The statute of limitations for many defenses is 5 years, and final month would have been 5 years from the congressional testimony that Comey gave wherein they’re alleging that he lied.
Trump put in a brand new prosecutor within the Japanese District of Virginia late final month, after the earlier prosecutor refused to go after Comey and James. This prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, is now bringing these seemingly retributive instances. Within the Comey and James instances, she introduced the indictment to the grand jury solo; that’s extraordinarily uncommon. And she or he can also be the one individual whose signature is on the indictment (usually you’d see the signature of no less than one assistant U.S. lawyer who’s engaged on the case), which makes it fairly clear that she is channeling the White Home’s needs right here.
Will: Halligan was appointed amid an effort by the president to pressure out many high prosecutors. What are the sorts of guardrails in place on the DOJ to stop it from getting used as a political weapon?
Quinta: The usual for getting an indictment earlier than a grand jury isn’t excessive, making it an authority that’s very easy to abuse. What the Justice Division has accomplished to stop that’s to construct up these sorts of guardrails of inner pointers that inform prosecutors learn how to behave. The Justice Division’s inner handbook says it’s best to solely convey a case earlier than a grand jury for those who suppose you possibly can win a conviction at trial. Prosecutors who had been abiding by that appear to have reached the conclusion that there was merely nothing to the James case or the Comey case, and subsequently these instances shouldn’t be introduced.
You find yourself with a scenario the place the one one who is outwardly prepared to place these instances in entrance of the grand jury is Halligan—someone who has no prosecutorial expertise, had by no means served within the Justice Division earlier than this, and doesn’t appear sure by these Justice Division guidelines within the ways in which earlier prosecutors felt that they had been.
Will: What does a wholesome relationship between the White Home and the Division of Justice appear like?
Quinta: Within the post-Watergate period, a thicket of norms and practices has grown up across the significance of sustaining legislation enforcement’s independence from the president. The division actually constructed up this ethos, which presidents have roughly revered till Trump, that the Justice Division is a part of the manager department, it’s constitutionally underneath the management of the president, however there are sturdy, normative restrictions across the president utilizing the division as a weapon.
Trump has been very efficient in reshaping public perceptions of the Justice Division as one thing that can be utilized on this means. And he did it by arguing that the Biden administration had accomplished it to him. His commentary on these points is actually, Nicely, I used to be prosecuted, so why can’t you be too? (This line of argument is especially flimsy, given these had been instances the place the Justice Division took pains to guarantee that they weren’t topic to political affect.) And I believe what that does is makes it look like that is frequent observe when it’s really not. I fear that that has damaged the general public notion of the connection between the president and the Justice Division in a means that’s going to be very onerous to get again.
Will: With these norms out the window, what would possibly occur to the DOJ?
Quinta: Proper now, there are fewer mechanisms than there was for policing Trump’s actions, thanks in vital half to the Supreme Courtroom’s ruling on the immunity case, which principally mentioned, We predict that the president has the constitutional authority to inform the Justice Division what to do. And so Trump truly has a fairly sturdy case that what he’s doing is constitutional, whether or not or not it’s a good suggestion.
In Watergate, you noticed what was often known as the Saturday Evening Bloodbath: There was this bulk resignation of Justice Division management when Nixon ordered the firing of Archibald Cox, the particular prosecutor investigating him. However any mutiny that’s going to occur right here goes to be quieter. In some methods, I believe we’re seeing it already. We’ve seen a rare quantity of leaking popping out of the division over the course of those investigations, all principally saying, Prosecutors suppose that there’s no foundation for these prices. One type of resistance is protecting your tracks and quietly making it obvious to the press that you don’t like this. One other is simply that individuals are leaving. We’re seeing a fairly astonishing exodus of expertise from throughout the division. And I believe a number of that’s that folks see what’s occurring. They don’t prefer it, they usually don’t need to go together with it.
Will: What does a DOJ completely filled with Halligans appear like?
Quinta: They’re going to have bother truly prosecuting these instances. I’d not be shocked within the slightest if each the Comey indictment and the James indictment actually fall flat. Past these particular instances, the broader hollowing out of expertise is making it a lot tougher for the Justice Division to convey even fundamental instances, simply because they don’t have the assets.
Will: How does Comey—and James, too, if that is the route her protection decides to go—show that he’s being unfairly focused as a rival of the president’s?
Quinta: Vindictive prosecution is the concept that you’re being prosecuted solely due to improper causes. You executed a constitutional proper, and now you might be being punished. There’s additionally a associated concept of selective prosecution: 100 individuals did the identical factor that I did, however solely I’m being prosecuted. We all know that Comey goes to convey this movement; his lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, has mentioned as a lot. I’d not be shocked within the slightest if James introduced the identical movement. And although these motions are very troublesome to win, these two individuals have what should be one of many strongest instances for such a movement ever.
Associated:
At present’s Information
- The Trump administration has began shedding federal employees as the federal government shutdown persists, in line with Workplace of Administration and Funds Director Russell Vought. An administration official mentioned that these firings “can be substantial.”
- MIT rejected the Trump administration’s proposed “Compact for Tutorial Excellence in Larger Schooling,” which affords funding benefits to 9 universities in change for his or her adopting conservative insurance policies. In a public letter, President Sally Kornbluth mentioned the compact’s premise “is inconsistent with our core perception that scientific funding ought to be primarily based on scientific benefit alone.”
- The Venezuelan opposition chief María Corina Machado, who has been in hiding since final 12 months, received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her dedication to democratic rights and efforts to guide a peaceable transition from Nicolás Maduro’s rule.
Dispatches
Discover all of our newsletters right here.
Night Learn
The Many Lives of Eliza Schuyler
By Jane Kamensky
The American Revolution clearly meant one thing to North American ladies. A few of them waged it, encamping with the armies, cooking, cleansing, and nursing, and, in a number of distinctive instances, grabbing muskets themselves. Many reckoned with its beliefs; pervasive speak of liberty held specific portent for ladies’s lives. And just about all ladies east of the Appalachians skilled the violence, illness, and shortage of a civil warfare wherein entrance traces and residential fronts had been by no means far aside.
However what did ladies imply to the American Revolution?
Learn the total article.
Extra From The Atlantic
Tradition Break
Pay attention. Taylor Swift’s new chart-topper is an achievement of e-commerce, not music, Spencer Kornhaber writes.
Discover. Simply how actual ought to Colonial Williamsburg be? Telling the total story of the city’s previous is a straightforward solution to make lots of people mad, Clint Smith writes.
Play our every day crossword.
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this article.
Whenever you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
