The Journalist Who Cried Treason
The obsession that might overtake Craig Unger’s life, get him labeled a member of the “tinfoil-hat brigade,” and almost destroy his profession as an investigative reporter took root on an April morning in 1991. Scanning The New York Occasions and ingesting his espresso, he stumbled on an op-ed detailing a treasonous plot that had sabotaged Jimmy Carter’s reelection efforts a decade earlier—a plot that might grow to be identified, considerably satirically, because the October shock.
Gary Sick, a former Iran specialist on the Nationwide Safety Council, was alleging that through the 1980 presidential marketing campaign, whereas greater than 50 People had been being held hostage in Iran, Ronald Reagan’s crew made a backroom arms take care of the brand new Islamic Republic to delay the hostages’ launch till after the election. Carter, bedeviled by the worldwide fiasco, can be denied the narrative he wanted to save lots of his sinking probabilities—an October shock, that’s—and Reagan may announce the People’ freedom simply after he was sworn in (which he went on to do).
This story was “actually unimaginable,” Unger writes in his new guide, Den of Spies—a criminal offense of the best order. He was hooked.
Talking with me concerning the October shock from a leather-based sales space at a Greenwich Village tavern greater than three many years later, Unger, now 75, lit up. Uncovering precisely how Republican operatives had improbably and secretly labored out an settlement with Ayatollah Khomeini would give him an opportunity to be Woodward and Bernstein, or Seymour Hersh—journalistic heroes whose crusading investigations he revered. “For anybody who had missed out on Watergate, the October Shock appeared to supply one other shot,” he writes in Den of Spies. However it will not be Unger’s Watergate. It might be his undoing. Inside a yr, the story was downgraded to a hoax and Unger was each out of a job at Newsweek and being sued for $10 million. He had grow to be, he writes, “poisonous.”
By Craig Unger
Now, although, on the power of newer and extra credible proof, he’s returning to the story. Den of Spies is not only a summation of his years of regular analysis into the plot, and never even only a play for redemption; it’s a referendum of types on a method of journalism that when dominated the day.
Unger is what anybody would name an old-school reporter. His instincts had been fashioned through the Watergate period, when the general public’s reflexive belief in authorities was excessive (someplace close to 70 % earlier than Richard Nixon took workplace, versus about 20 % right now) and journalists started fashioning themselves as adversaries with the presumption that the worst abuses of energy had been taking place behind closed doorways. Their position was to interrupt People’ credulity—they usually did. After I met Unger in mid-September, a second obvious try on Donald Trump’s life had simply occurred. I requested him for his first thought. “Cui bono?” he mentioned. “Who advantages from it?” He wasn’t saying it had been a false-flag operation. However he undoubtedly began from the premise that it might need been.
That is how Unger thinks. His earlier two books tried to cement the concept that Donald Trump is an asset of Vladimir Putin. Unger’s modus operandi is to level to many various dots after which marvel at how they could join, even when he can’t join them himself or when these dots are being served up by deeply unreliable sources, resembling a former KGB agent. Suspicion is what issues. He traffics doubtful. One unfavourable overview of his guide American Kompromat in The Guardian described it as “dozens and dozens of untamed tales and salacious accusations, nearly all ‘too good to test,’ within the parlance of old-time journalists.”
In the case of the October shock, Unger couldn’t quit on it, even after it quickly moved from information to obvious pretend information. A buddy known as the story his “white whale” (“I didn’t should be reminded that issues had ended badly for Captain Ahab,” Unger writes). With none publication to help his continued pursuit of the story, he traveled to Paris and Tehran on his personal to interview sources, made his method by way of 1000’s of pages of paperwork and gross sales receipts, combed by way of all of it yr after yr. His guide incorporates all of this proof, revealed throughout one other consequential October—and touchdown, as a type of private reward, on Carter’s a hundredth birthday.
However the world by which Unger is now laying out his proof could be very totally different from the America of 1980, and even of 1991, when his fixation started. Belief in leaders has eroded so fully that nobody is moved anymore by the revelations of secrets and techniques, lies, or treachery—if you wish to hear about stolen elections, simply tune in to any Trump rally. Definitive proof will now should compete with crazy conspiracy theories. That is unlucky, as a result of the once-debunked October shock has shifted over the identical many years into the realm of excessive plausibility (although nothing near agreed-upon historical past). And Unger and some different reporters of his technology are accountable. They assume that what really occurred nonetheless issues.
“I don’t wish to be flawed,” Unger instructed me, obtrusive by way of tortoiseshell glasses. “And worse, I don’t wish to be known as flawed once I’m proper.”
The alleged linchpin of the October shock was William Casey, Reagan’s marketing campaign supervisor by way of most of 1980. Casey was the top of secret intelligence for Europe within the Workplace of Strategic Companies, the precursor to the CIA, throughout World Conflict II, and for the remainder of his life maintained a broad community of contacts among the many spies and dodgy arms sellers of the world. He was a furtive, mumbly man; a Manichaean thinker; a Chilly Warrior; and, as Unger put it to me, a “dazzlingly sensible spy.” Casey additionally appeared to have few scruples about doing what was wanted to win. He was accused of getting obtained Carter’s debate briefing papers through the 1980 marketing campaign. And as soon as the election was over, Casey was made director of the CIA.
A lot of Unger’s guide focuses on Casey and the connections and motives that might place him on the heart of such a plot, one that might contain breaking an embargo to illegally provide Iran with much-needed spare components and weapons and utilizing Israel as a conduit to take action (a stunning collaboration to think about right now).
After Sick’s 1991 op-ed, each main information publication sought to comply with up and examine. A lot of the reporting centered on whether or not Casey was current at conferences in Madrid on the finish of July 1980, when the plan was supposedly hatched. Infinite trivia surrounded this query. Unger confirmed me a replica of an attendance chart from a convention in London across the finish of July, at which Casey was a participant. For the 2 days he was supposedly in Madrid for the conferences, a number of the test marks on the chart indicating his presence in London are in mild pencil, not in pen, which means that he was anticipated however probably by no means confirmed; did he sneak off to Spain? “Anybody can see this, proper?” Unger mentioned, squinting on the chart.
The items of this puzzle had been that tiny. Or they concerned shady characters who mentioned they had been on the Madrid conferences or their follow-ups and will attest to the plotting—folks such because the brothers Cyrus and Jamshid Hashemi, Iranian businessmen who had been performing, Unger alleges, as double brokers, pretending to barter the hostage launch with Carter whereas working with Casey to stall it for Reagan’s profit.
Unger, who had been a contract investigative reporter, was employed by Newsweek, shortly after Esquire revealed his first article on the October shock, to hitch a crew devoted to monitoring down the plot. Like Woodward and Bernstein on Watergate, Unger imagined the crew would do a collection of tales main, finally, all the way in which to the White Home. One model of the speculation even positioned George H. W. Bush, who in 1991 was starting a reelection marketing campaign, in Paris for the ultimate planning conferences with the Iranians.
And as with Watergate and different conspiracy investigations of assorted credibility—whether or not the cigarette trade’s cover-ups or Iraq’s purported weapons of mass destruction—this one relied on a rogues’ gallery of sources. Unger made contact with Ari Ben-Menashe, an arms seller who claimed to be an intelligence asset for the Israeli Army Intelligence Directorate. Ben-Menashe gave Unger particulars concerning the deal and described Casey’s participation. Unger knew that Ben-Menashe was not precisely to be trusted—most Israeli intelligence officers dismissed him as a low-level translator—however Unger thought of it well worth the threat. “The reality is, individuals who know most about crimes are criminals,” he instructed me. “Individuals who know most about espionage are spies. And what you need to do is hear them out and corroborate.” When he tried to do this, Unger mentioned, he was “eviscerated.”
Newsweek was not serious about an incremental Watergate-like construct. As a substitute of Unger’s scoops, they revealed an article about how Ben-Menashe was a liar who had helped invent the story of the October shock. Different publications adopted. Unger had no time and no outlet to make his case, and he appeared like he’d been taken for a trip. These characterizations, he mentioned, “carried the day when it comes to making a essential mass that overwhelmed any information we may floor.”
Unger was quickly out at Newsweek. Then he and Esquire had been sued for libel by Robert “Bud” McFarlane, Reagan’s nationwide safety adviser (the case was thrown out, and McFarlane misplaced his subsequent attraction). Two congressional investigations wanting into the plot had been launched within the early Nineties; the Home produced an almost 1,000-page report. Each inquiries concluded that no proof of a conspiracy existed. In line with the chair of the Home activity power, the entire story was the product of sources who had been “both wholesale fabricators or had been impeached by documentary proof.”
There was no query that for those who pursued this, you had been completed,” Unger instructed me. He tried to rebuild his profession, finally turning into the editor of Boston journal after which transferring again into freelance journalism. He wasn’t precisely the Ahab of the October shock; that doubtful honor belongs to Robert Parry, one other old-school sort who modeled himself on I. F. Stone, the paragon of unbiased journalists. It was Parry who saved discovering extra clues, together with, in 2011, a White Home memo that definitively put Casey in Madrid for the July 1980 conferences. Parry died in 2018, forsaking all of his collected recordsdata, together with 23 gigabytes of paperwork. Unger used this materials to reopen his personal investigation.
Within the years since that first op-ed was revealed, loads of different testimony and proof had helped bolster the October-surprise concept, a few of it from extra dependable sources—notably Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, the president of Iran in 1980, who insisted to anybody who would pay attention that he had been conscious of the plot. Unger went to satisfy with Bani-Sadr at his house in Versailles, and traveled to Iran in 2014 to see if he may choose up any leads. Among the many new materials within the guide, Unger reveals information he uncovered that seem to doc shipments of army tools from Israel to Iran across the time of the November 1980 election.
And simply final yr, The New York Occasions revealed a bombshell report by which Ben Barnes, a outstanding Texas politician, revealed a secret he had been holding for almost 43 years: In 1980, he traveled all through the Center East with John Connally, the previous Texas governor, seemingly on the behest of Casey to ask Arab leaders to steer Iran to delay the hostage launch. Barnes mentioned he wished so as to add to the document whereas Carter was nonetheless alive. “Historical past must know that this occurred,” Barnes instructed the Occasions.
After this story, The New Republic ran an essay co-authored by Sick, the previous Nationwide Safety Council official; Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s chief domestic-policy adviser; and two outstanding Carter biographers, Kai Fowl and Jonathan Alter. Underneath the headline “It’s All however Settled,” they wrote that they now “imagine that it’s time to maneuver previous conspiracy theories to exhausting historic conclusions concerning the so-called October Shock.” Like Unger, that they had little doubt that Casey “ran a multipronged covert operation to control the 1980 presidential election.”
The percentages that Unger will get a renewed listening to for the October shock—vindicating himself and possibly Carter too—are low. The latest bizarro episode within the present election would possibly clarify why. As anybody following alongside will recall, the vice-presidential candidate J. D. Vance, in search of to stoke fears about immigrants, helped unfold a rumor that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, had been consuming residents’ cats and canine. This was not true—and he knew it. “If I’ve to create tales in order that the American media really pays consideration to the struggling of the American folks, then that’s what I’m going to do,” he lately instructed CNN.
Unger needs to unmask politicians and reveal the reality. However we now stay in a rustic the place politicians appear to brazenly brag about mendacity, and sufficient folks despise the media a lot that they’re prepared to imagine these lies anyway. We’ve got an epistemic downside that no Woodward or Bernstein may remedy. Detailing an almost half-century-old conspiracy concept, even with Unger’s mass of proof—the receipts, a videotaped interview with Jamshid Hashemi, these little pencil test marks on an outdated attendance chart—would learn like outdated information to 1 half of the nation and partisan revisionism to the opposite half.
Reporters used to have the ability to change the “nationwide dialog,” Unger instructed me. That’s what he hoped to do, inconceivable because it appears even to him. As soon as upon a time, the massive newspapers and tv networks had, Unger mentioned, “sufficient authority {that a} massive story would actually simply land massive and alter the dialog, and that the organs of presidency would immediately click on into motion to reply with congressional investigations. It’s so exhausting to get that finished.”
I questioned, although, in my discussions with Unger, whether or not reporters like him bore a number of the duty—whether or not the sort of skepticism and distrust that marked his technology of journalists had helped create our post-truth actuality. There have been moments when he slipped from crusading fact teller to one thing nearer to a conspiracy theorist prepared to imagine probably the most outlandish speculations. Within the guide, for instance, with little or no proof, he entertains the concept that rogue spies seeking to undermine Carter sabotaged the helicopters utilized in a failed hostage-rescue mission in April 1980, which ended with eight troopers dying in a crash. I requested Unger whether or not he actually believed this. “Nicely, I believe it’s a chance,” he instructed me.
It was simpler to sympathize with Unger—to see the real idealism behind the swagger—when he defined why he couldn’t ever let go of the speculation that had so hobbled his profession.
He grew up in Dallas; his father was an endocrinologist and his mom owned the largest unbiased bookstore within the metropolis. Unger instructed me a few go to he took to the Dachau focus camp when he was 14, in 1963. This was as a substitute of a bar mitzvah. Whereas there, he noticed Germans atoning for his or her nationwide sins, not even 20 years after the top of the struggle, and it stayed with him, that trustworthy reckoning with the previous. He instructed me it made him consider his metropolis’s personal Lee Park, named after the Accomplice basic and defender of slavery, and the way shameful it was that so lengthy after the top of the Civil Conflict, Lee’s title was unapologetically honored.
“When my colleagues and I first took on the October Shock greater than thirty years in the past, we grew to become actors in a case research of America’s denial of its darkish historical past, its refusal to simply accept the ugly fact,” Unger writes in his guide. After Unger instructed me the story about his childhood and Lee Park, I appeared up the inexperienced house and noticed that it had been renamed Turtle Creek Park in 2019. Ugly truths, even in America, do often get acknowledged—however it could take longer than one journalist’s lifetime for that to occur.
If you purchase a guide utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
