Howard Lutnick’s Epstein Story Doesn’t Make Any Sense

That is an version of The Atlantic Every day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends one of the best in tradition. Join it right here.
“I’ve nothing to cover. Completely nothing,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick instructed a Senate committee yesterday. Maybe that’s true—however given his current historical past, don’t wager on it.
Throughout a podcast interview this previous fall, Lutnick talked about an unsettling encounter he and his spouse had with the late intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein, who was once his next-door neighbor, in 2005. After Epstein provided them a home tour and confirmed them his notorious therapeutic massage desk, Lutnick recalled, he was creeped out and left. “My spouse and I made a decision that I’ll by no means be within the room with that disgusting individual ever once more,” he mentioned. “So I used to be by no means within the room with him socially, for enterprise, and even philanthropy.”
Solely that wasn’t true in any respect. Paperwork within the Epstein information launched by the Justice Division present repeated, if extra cordial than chummy, dialog between the 2 males, in addition to some shared enterprise dealings. That’s okay, you would possibly assume—they by no means frolicked socially once more. Proper? He appeared to substantiate that, just lately telling The New York Instances, “I spent zero time with him.”
Properly, about that: Yesterday, testifying earlier than Congress, Lutnick reiterated, “I barely had something to do with that individual.” Then he admitted to having visited Epstein’s personal island in 2012.
“I did have lunch with him, as I used to be on a ship going throughout on a household trip,” Lutnick mentioned. “My spouse was with me, as have been my 4 kids and nannies. I had one other couple; they have been there as nicely, with their kids. And we had lunch on the island. That’s true. For an hour. And we left with all of my kids, with my nannies, with my spouse.”
Lutnick appears understandably keen to indicate that he was not concerned in sexual misconduct, and as Senator Chris Van Hollen famous, there isn’t a proof that he was. However he has no reply for his deceptive statements about his dealings with Epstein, and his earlier lies make it tougher to consider him now. A lot for having nothing to cover.
The Trump administration has at all times been tied to the Epstein scandal—the president himself was as soon as an in depth good friend of Epstein’s—however these new particulars drag his allies nonetheless additional into the highlight. Even earlier than his testimony, Lutnick was dealing with calls to resign from Democrats in addition to from renegade Republican Consultant Thomas Massie of Kentucky. The secretary, whose penchant for placing his foot in his mouth was already nicely established, appears to have held on to his job this lengthy solely as a result of he’s personally pleasant with Donald Trump and since the president refuses to present his political adversaries satisfaction by firing anybody. (This stands in distinction to many different organizations and establishments which have been wanting to create distance from Epstein by separating themselves from people who have been related to him.)
However Lutnick isn’t the one prime Trump aide to return up within the new tranche of paperwork. Navy Secretary John Phelan, a reported billionaire Trump donor who was appointed regardless of missing any navy or naval expertise, was listed as a passenger on flights between London and New York on Epstein’s personal airplane in 2006. (The flights came about earlier than Epstein was first indicted later that 12 months; Phelan has not been accused of any wrongdoing and has not commented on the revelations.)
One cause the Epstein information have created such a stir is that they’ve revealed the flowery social and monetary ties amongst so many individuals in positions of energy. It’s not that the majority and even lots of the large names who seem in them have been pedophiles or sexual predators, however relatively that their dealings with him exhibit that there’s a rich, highly effective, globe-trotting membership, and the remainder of us ain’t in it. Lutnick inadvertently bolstered this picture together with his mentions of his “nannies,” plural. These obtrusive markers of privilege are what Senator Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat, was speaking about this previous weekend when he referred to as the Trump administration “a authorities of, by, and for the ultrarich. It’s the wealthiest Cupboard ever. That is the Epstein class ruling our nation.”
The protection that individuals related to Epstein—from the billionaire financier Lutnick to the leftist mental Noam Chomsky and his spouse—have provided is that they didn’t grasp Epstein’s abuses once they socialized with him and have been appalled as soon as they did. One downside is that that is typically demonstrably false: Lutnick visited the island 4 years after Epstein’s conviction for intercourse crimes, and emails present Chomsky providing Epstein public-relations recommendation after accusations turned public.
One other downside is that a lot of them ought to have recognized. You don’t must take my phrase for it. Take Trump’s. In 2019, he declared his shock on the Epstein allegations: “No, I had no concept. I had no concept.” However the Palm Seaside police chief on the time recalled that Trump recommended him in July 2006, when expenses first turned public. “Thank goodness you’re stopping him; everybody has recognized he’s been doing this,” Trump mentioned, as reported by Julie Okay. Brown of the Miami Herald.
(Trump might have had his suspicions for a while. In 2002, he instructed New York that Epstein is “plenty of enjoyable to be with. It’s even mentioned that he likes lovely girls as a lot as I do, and plenty of of them are on the youthful aspect.”)
The Epstein revelations are beginning to sink in for members of Congress. “Properly, initially, my response to all this was, ‘I don’t care. I don’t know what the massive deal is.’ However now I see what the massive deal is, and it was price investigating,” Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican, instructed NewsNation. (One cause Lummis could also be keen to say so is that she is retiring, which insulates her from Trump’s wrath.)
These revelations about Trump’s shut allies might have an effect on the GOP’s electoral probabilities if sufficient voters develop into conscious of them, however on the identical time that members of the Trump administration are popping up within the newly launched information, protection in conservative media shops has dropped considerably, CNN’s Aaron Blake experiences. The result’s that Democratic voters, who already dislike and mistrust the president, are listening to an amazing deal about Epstein, however Republican ones, who is perhaps swayed, are usually not. When MAGA pundits reminiscent of Dan Bongino talked a couple of media cover-up of the Epstein scandal, they have been onto one thing—they have been simply mistaken in regards to the media shops in query.
Associated:
Listed here are 4 new tales from The Atlantic:
Right now’s Information
- Lawyer Basic Pam Bondi testified earlier than Congress amid questioning over the Justice Division’s launch of information associated to Jeffrey Epstein that exposed delicate sufferer info; Bondi defended the division’s actions.
- Federal officers provided conflicting explanations for an in a single day closure of airspace over El Paso, Texas, that briefly grounded flights earlier than it ended early at the moment. The Federal Aviation Administration initially cited “particular safety causes” when it ordered what was initially purported to be a 10-day halt; a U.S. official confirmed to Fox Information that the stoppage was prompted as a result of the U.S. navy had shot down a celebration balloon that it had suspected was a cartel drone.
- The Home is about to vote to overturn President Trump’s tariffs on Canada after a number of Republicans broke with celebration leaders to permit Democrats to advance the measure.
Night Learn
AI Is Getting Scary Good at Making Predictions
By Ross Andersen
To reside in time is to surprise what’s going to occur subsequent. In each human society, there are individuals who obsess over the world’s patterns to foretell the longer term. In antiquity, they instructed kings which stars would seem at dusk. Right now they construct the quantitative fashions that nudge governments into opening spigots of capital. They decide winners on Wall Road. They estimate the chance of earthquakes for insurance coverage firms. They inform commodities merchants at hedge funds in regards to the subsequent month’s climate.
For years, some elite forecasters have been competing in opposition to each other in tournaments the place they reply questions on occasions that can occur—or not—within the coming months or years. The questions span various material as a result of they’re meant to measure normal forecasting means, not slim experience. Gamers could also be requested whether or not a coup will happen in an unstable nation, or to challenge the longer term deforestation fee in some a part of the Amazon. They could be requested what number of songs from a forthcoming Taylor Swift album will prime the streaming charts. The forecaster who makes essentially the most correct predictions, as early as doable, can earn a money prize and, maybe extra essential, the esteem of the world’s most gifted seers.
Learn the total article.
Extra From The Atlantic
Tradition Break
Discover. The Sundance Movie Pageant, which as soon as helped flip small films into blockbusters, is shedding its Hollywood pull, Shirley Li writes.
Replicate. Spencer Kornhaber on what occurred to the good American protest live performance.
Play our every day crossword.
Discover all of our newsletters right here.
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this text.
If you purchase a guide utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.


